Differences between revisions 3 and 4
Revision 3 as of 2021-06-30 20:20:31
Size: 1015
Comment:
Revision 4 as of 2021-06-30 20:21:24
Size: 1070
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 10: Line 10:
I'm sure this is an important contribution to the academic literature, but it isn't designed for me, much less for the innumerate folk I hope to convince that violence/vandalism/threat is counterproductive. I don't mind numbers, in an explanatory context. I prefer them to be arranged into sequential narratives, not strings of citations. I'm sure this is an important contribution to the academic literature, but it isn't designed for me, much less for the innumerate folk I hope to convince that violence/vandalism/threat is counterproductive. I don't mind numbers, in an explanatory context. I don't mind citations - as footnotes. I prefer facts and syntheses to be arranged into sequential narratives, not strings of citations.

Why Civil Resistance Works:

The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict

pub December 11, 2012 / C.Mill 303.61 CHENOWETH

by Erica Chenoweth, Maria Stephan

In a very prolix and disjointed way, this book seems to say that broad-based nonviolent "revolution" is more successful and lasting than militarized attacks on the state.

I wanted to like this, but the jargon, inline citations, and unexplained sociological wonk-speak defeated me. Is a number N.N logged the same as 10N.N?

I'm sure this is an important contribution to the academic literature, but it isn't designed for me, much less for the innumerate folk I hope to convince that violence/vandalism/threat is counterproductive. I don't mind numbers, in an explanatory context. I don't mind citations - as footnotes. I prefer facts and syntheses to be arranged into sequential narratives, not strings of citations.

Plenty of books being written; perhaps other authors have "dumbed down" the Chenoweth/Stephan book into a "Science News" level of jargon.

CivilResistance (last edited 2021-06-30 21:45:33 by KeithLofstrom)