Differences between revisions 11 and 12
Revision 11 as of 2025-03-05 07:58:01
Size: 3819
Comment:
Revision 12 as of 2025-03-05 08:27:45
Size: 4988
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 27: Line 27:
 . [[ | ]]
 . [[ | ]]
 . [[ | ]]
 . [[ https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-usa-nuclearpower-idUSKBN2BA0CN/ | Advanced nuclear reactors no safer than conventional nuclear plants, says science group ]] 2021 March 18
 . [[ https://www.osti.gov/biblio/10185731 | The Nuclear Detonation Detection System on the GPS satellites ]] 1993 July 27
 . [[ https://www.sipri.org/yearbook/2022/10 | 10. World nuclear forces ]]
 . [[ https://www.energy.gov/articles/what-stranger-things-didnt-get-quite-so-right-about-energy-department | What “Stranger Things” Didn’t Get Quite-So-Right About the Energy Department ]] Paul Lester 2016 August 5
 . [[ https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/16/the-bomb-in-the-backyard/ | The Bomb in the Backyard ]]
 . [[ https://trivalleycares.org/2021/groups-fire-back-at-feds-move-to-dismiss-plutonium-pit-lawsuit | Groups Fire Back at Feds’ Move to Dismiss Plutonium Pit Lawsuit ]]
 . [[ https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/trumps-troubling-nuclear-plan | Trump’s Troubling Nuclear Plan ]]
 . [[ https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/w87-1-modification-program-fact-sheet | W87-1 Modification Program fact sheet ]]
 . [[ https://media.nti.org/pdfs/WG1_Verifying_Baseline_Declarations_FINAL.pdf | Nuclear Thread Initiative: Innovating Verification: New Tools & New Actors to Reduce Nuclear Risks ]]
Line 36: Line 42:
 . [[ | ]]
 . [[ | ]]
 . [[ | ]]
 . [[ | ]]
 . [[ | ]]
 . [[ | ]]

Count Down

The Blinding Future of Nuclear Weapons

Sarah Scoles . . 2024 . . Beaverton Lib 355.8251

264 pages including references and index. I lost interest around page 70. Perhaps I will try again after I read the other thousand books in my incoming pile.

The focus is on stockpile maintenance. Electronics upgrades, new circuit technology replacing old unavailable devices, But the main problem is radioactive decay of the "pits", the vaguely described balls of plutonium/uranium/?? that radioactively decay into inert or fission damping elements. Very slow decay; the pits probably work fine, like the last US weapons tested in 1992, and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty signed by Clinton in 1996, but not ratified by the Senate, or by China, Russia, US, Iran, and Israel .

The subject matter is necessarily vague, because the most "interesting" information is classified. Hence my loss of interest. Some pointers to other books and documents that I might read someday.

References

CountDown (last edited 2025-03-05 08:48:43 by KeithLofstrom)