The End of Doom

Environmental Renewal in the Twenty-first Century

Ronald Bailey, 363.7 B35E 2015, St. Martin's Press, PCC Library

The revolution will not be televised, because the nuances of ecological success cannot be reduced to soundbites.

Ronald Bailey is "libertarian spectrum", as am I, though that is a big spectrum of independent thinkers. I found a lot to like in the book, some of it was preaching to the choir, and some set off alarms. I hope to find time to check out both. We are both 1953 boomers, and both techno-optimists (whom techno-pessimists castigate and mischaracterize in email, websites, word-processed books, and tweets sent from their smart phones).

Bailey describes his initial enthusiasm for ideological environmentalism, and his subsequent observation-driven (we are still here, and doing better than ever) rejection of that. Perhaps an overreaction; "End of Doom" is techno-optimistic, but accepts climate change as real.

Like those who oppose him, Bailey attributes opposition to protection of income. Even if this is accurate, it is not verifiable, being an external speculation about internal mental state. My observation is that people who do not express strong views on controversial topics are more financially successful than ideologues - fewer offended customers, more attention to business operation.

Bailey cites the Yale Cultural Cognition Project - most people derive their attitudes about science from their cultural values. He describes Individualists vs. Communitarians, Hierarchicalists vs. Egalitarians. Bailey might be a I./H., I suspect I am closer to an I./E. A third axis might involve means and mobility - what Virginia Postrel calls "Dynamism" vs "Stasism" - seeking change rather than seeking stability. I'm getting old, and feel the attaction of hanging on to what I have, but believe that more is possible for me and others. So, ideologically, I am I./E./D., an explosive combination. I want to do better, and want others to do better as well. I hope the poor do better faster, because small steps towards the mean are easier than big steps above it, but recognize that those with concentrated resources are the most capable of creating more. 0.1% of a factory is useless - unless (somehow) I help create the tools to facilitate high-performance distributed productivity. That can be done with information, but information flows through integrated circuits, and (in 2016) integrated circuits can only be made in enormous, expensive factories by vast teams of skilled people.

Bailey's Bozos

Paul Ehrlich, Garrett Hardin, Lester Brown, Alan Weisman, Rachel Carson, Jeremy Rifkin. Gilles-Eric Seralini, Vandana Shiva, Naomi Kline, Bill McKibben, Union of Concerned Scientists, Greenpeace, Worldwatch Institute

Book notes

• P2/3: Anecdote illustrating stabilizing population statistics - lifespan up, birthrate down. 9 billion in 2060, reductions after.
• P14: Paul Waggoner: We can feed 10 billion people with half the land and advanced technology.
• P15: Munoz and Gonzalo 2013 - past population growth follows UN low-variant trend

• P16: 2050: 8.7B, 2100 8.0B Sanjeev Sanyal(not Sanjay), Predictions of a Rogue Demographer

• P17: women with more education have fewer children - 2014, Wolfgang Lutz, World Population and Human Capital in the 21st Century

• P19: 2008: Bobbi S. Low et. al. Influences on Women's Reproductive Lives: UnexpectedEcological Underpinnings

• P19: 2013: Bobbi S. Low et. al. Life Expectancy, Fertility, and Women's Lives: A Life-History perspective

• P25: 2002: Seth Norton Population Growth, Economic Freedom, and the Rule of Law

• P31-73: Peak commodity shifts futureward, no incentive to search for more resources when ample reserves exist.
  • reserves = known deposits , resources = geologically/technologically plausible deposits
• P63: shared autonomous vehicles ... can save resources

  • see IEEE Spectrum, 2016/02, G. Pascal Zachary, The Trouble With Targets. "Grand aspirations for engineering must be matched with an awareness of the potential for choosing the wrong target or messing up in pursuit of the right one. All we can know for certain is that our good intentions are never enough"

  • why is the overall goal moving meat in cans, rather than moving minds at the speed of light, and muscles at the speed of health?
• P65: Tilapia and Catfish - hm; depends on source and Omega-3 content, which depends on feed sources, yes?
• P66: Sergey Brin backing New Harvest lab-grown meat - ditto.
• P75-94: Precautionary principle - Virginia Postrel's ideas more explanatory. Upwardly mobile (poor or rich) like chosen change, downwardly mobile oppose change. Nobody likes losing what they have.
• P123 Epidemiologists find far more low-confidence false positives, 5 to 10% of observational studies are replicated. Negative results rarely replicated.
• P154: Stacking several pest resistant traits, much higher evolutionary barrier to evolved resistance
• P163: $136M to bring new bioenhanced variety to market "in part because of regulatory requirements"
  • this drives out small seed companies, there are 6 big players left
    • can they research collaboratively, or crosslicense?
    • can they do high payoff, high risk research then sell successes to the big guys?
  • if there were no regulations, how much would this cost drop?
  • after the simple discoveries made, would the price rise again
• P164: Farmer suicide in India: Bt cotton actually boosts income and food security.
  • Anoop Sadanandan: Most commit suicide because of banking changes and predatory loan sharks. Rates similar to Scotland and France.
• P175: Changed mind about climate change in 2005, based on balance of scientific evidence
  • decision driven by temperature measurements, not heat budget or physics

• P190: 10x CO2 causes reef calcification declines, but no tipping points: S. Comeau et. al., The responses of eight coral reef calcifiers to increasing partial pressure of CO2 do not exhibit a tipping point

• P197: Not damaging yet - climate damage because there is more stuff and people to harm.
• P208: Cap and trade corrupt, carbon/pollution taxes might work better
  • either way, how to avoid gaming the measurement?