Differences between revisions 25 and 26
Revision 25 as of 2025-04-15 08:00:53
Size: 20709
Comment:
Revision 26 as of 2025-04-15 08:16:37
Size: 21726
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 145: Line 145:
 .p254 Russell calls his approach "The Will to Doubt"
 .p255 [[ | ]]
 .p254 Russell calls his approach "The Will to Doubt" ... which is the title of [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Henry_Lloyd#The_Will_to_Doubt | Alfred Henry Lloyd's 1907 essay collection, responding to the 1896 [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_James | William James ]] essay collection [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Will_to_Believe | The Will to Believe ]]
 . I see too much "all or none" thinking. Indeed, treating '''everyone''' as a psychopath or criminal is wrong. Treating everyone as a saint can get you killed or maimed. What is the best approach to a veiled and uncertain world?
 .p255 "... If you go around forever doubting people ..." is silly absolutist non-reasoning. Of COURSE you start out by treating all others as good, while reserving enough ''ability to doubt'' so that you can intelligently modify your prior assumptions and deal with the specific situation that presents itself. You don't have to "carry a big stick", but be able to take away the big stick from a surprisingly hostile other - and wield that stick to get away, if trapped.

http://wiki.keithl.com/Humankind

Humankind

A Hopeful History

Rutger Bergman . 2019 . BeavLib 128 BRE


Humankind (last edited 2025-04-22 07:02:14 by KeithLofstrom)