Differences between revisions 4 and 5
Revision 4 as of 2026-02-13 05:22:11
Size: 4707
Comment:
Revision 5 as of 2026-02-13 07:02:38
Size: 8268
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 15: Line 15:
 .p020 [[ | ]]
 .p023 [[ | ]]
 .p023 [[ | ]]
 .p020 voting methods are filtered through meshes of anonymity, neutrality, and monotonicity
 .p023 [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster | filibuster ]] is Dutch word for pirate
 .p023 [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloture | cloture ]] fillibuster overridden if 60% of senators support it
Line 19: Line 19:
 .p028 [[ | ]]
 .p028 [[ | ]]
 .p031 [[ | ]]
 .p033 [[ | ]]
 .p036 [[ | ]]
 .p037 [[ | ]]
 .p037 [[ | ]]
 .p038 [[ | ]]
 .p039 [[ | ]]
 .p039 [[ | ]]
 .p040 [[ | ]]
 .p043 [[ | ]]
 .p044 [[ | ]]
 .p044 [[ | ]]
 .p046 [[ | ]]
 .p047 [[ | ]]
 .p048 [[ | ]]
 .p050 [[ | ]]
 .p028 [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plurality_(voting) | plurality ]] widely used because it is "simple"
 .p028 520,000 elected US officials, almost all elected by plurality
 .p031 plurality is deeply flawed
 .p033 "espousing fringe ideologies, as Trump did"
 .p036 up to 7 presidential elections 12% decided by a spoiler
 .p037 "Would you buy a gallon of milk of there was a 12% chance it was spoiled?"
   . Yes, if the alternative was no milk at all. Milk can be tested and boiled. Boiling politicians upsets most people.
 .p037 1.5% of general races are decided by third party spoilers, but non-partisan races might ...
   . or might not. data please,
 .p039 [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Duverger | Maurice Duverger ]] book Political Parties
  . plurality elections lead to two-party systems
 .p040 [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC | Citizens United ]] enabled large political donations, which author claims disadvantages minor party candidates
 .p043 "2011 Give us your cash ad on YouTube" cannot find, author doesn't understand web search on youtube - especially with more than 4 billion videos and youtube's funding formula Permanent link please
 .p044 2020 presidential election turnout 62%, 30th place among OECD countries
 .p046 2020 Alaska [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting | Instant-runoff voting ]]
 .p047 what if's with 6 candidates and second top-two runoff election
 .p048 2022 French presidential election, six candidates, top 2 chosen for runoff, 1.2% of total vote difference between second and third, 24% votes for 9 other candidates. Ranked choice instant runoff could have made a big difference here ... but those other votes were NOT "wasted", because the issues raised by ALL candidates might be adopted by the 2027 candidates. Elections result in CUMULATIVE knowledge of voter preferences
 .p050 turnout for runoff elections is 35% lower than first round. Number 2 might try harder, but number 3 through 9 give up.
Line 39: Line 39:
 .p064 [[ | ]]
 .p065 [[ | ]]
 .p066 [[ | ]]
 .p066 [[ | ]]
 .p067 [[ | ]]
 .p067 [[ | ]]
 .p068 [[ | ]]
 .p068 [[ | ]]
 .p069 [[ | ]]
 .p064 Alaska 2022 special election:
  .Peltola/Palin/Begich first-place(''first round?'') tally 75,799 / 58,937 / 53,810, sum 188,546
  . second round tally 91,266 / 86,026, sum 177,292 ... Peltola still won, but where did 11,254 second round votes disappear to? The book's author focuses on party, I focus on information that is NOT conveyed by voting.
 .p065 Minor candidates could assert themselves in the political process without being spoilers
 .p066 Author attributes campaign incivility to plurality voting. Perhaps the few jurisdictions with civil voters also prefer instant runoff voting. Causality can point both ways
 .p066 [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Quan | Jean Quan ]] won Oakland mayor because of her 25,000 second and third place votes, after 9 elimination rounds. Or because 67,000 Oaklanders are Asian, and some chose ethnicity third.
 .p067 Voter "mental paralysis overload" minimized with fewer candidates, maybe 4 or 5
 .p067 voters "vote many times" but only one (or zero) votes count
  . KHL actually, their ''voting patterns'' convey more information than just their vote, and those patterns can convey much useful (anonymized) information to their fellow citizens, bureaucrats, politicians
  . Downside - detailed pattern information and Big AI can de-anonymize voters and expose them to personal retribution
 .p068 2009 Burlington Vermont rank-choice voting elected a Progressive rather than the plurality-choice Republican. Rank-choice repealed for 2010. WELL, DUH! *THAT* is why we don't DESERVE ranked choice.
 .p069 ... suspicion ... The political-cultural shift that would have to accompany the transition to instant runoff is possibly its greatest obstacle.
  ."I don't need to win, I just need you to lose"

Making Democracy Count

Ismar Volic . 2024 . BvtLib 324.6 VOL


Part 1 . Voting

  • p001 Introduction

  • p009 PART 1 Voting

  • p011 ch01 The Best Way to Choose the Winner

  • p015 16yo attacked on TikTok for asking about the origin and value of algebra. Mathematicians explained that she asked deep and substantive questions that mathematicians struggled with for centuries

  • p015 n-dimensional object embedding theory

  • p016 Perron-Frobenius theoremGoogle Page Rank Algorithm

  • p016 Euler's theorem 1736 and internet encryption

  • p017 Social choice theory

  • p020 voting methods are filtered through meshes of anonymity, neutrality, and monotonicity
  • p023 filibuster is Dutch word for pirate

  • p023 cloture fillibuster overridden if 60% of senators support it

  • p028 ch02 The Worst Way to Choose the Winner

  • p028 plurality widely used because it is "simple"

  • p028 520,000 elected US officials, almost all elected by plurality
  • p031 plurality is deeply flawed
  • p033 "espousing fringe ideologies, as Trump did"
  • p036 up to 7 presidential elections 12% decided by a spoiler
  • p037 "Would you buy a gallon of milk of there was a 12% chance it was spoiled?"
    • Yes, if the alternative was no milk at all. Milk can be tested and boiled. Boiling politicians upsets most people.
  • p037 1.5% of general races are decided by third party spoilers, but non-partisan races might ...
    • or might not. data please,
  • p039 Maurice Duverger book Political Parties

    • plurality elections lead to two-party systems
  • p040 Citizens United enabled large political donations, which author claims disadvantages minor party candidates

  • p043 "2011 Give us your cash ad on YouTube" cannot find, author doesn't understand web search on youtube - especially with more than 4 billion videos and youtube's funding formula Permanent link please

  • p044 2020 presidential election turnout 62%, 30th place among OECD countries
  • p046 2020 Alaska Instant-runoff voting

  • p047 what if's with 6 candidates and second top-two runoff election
  • p048 2022 French presidential election, six candidates, top 2 chosen for runoff, 1.2% of total vote difference between second and third, 24% votes for 9 other candidates. Ranked choice instant runoff could have made a big difference here ... but those other votes were NOT "wasted", because the issues raised by ALL candidates might be adopted by the 2027 candidates. Elections result in CUMULATIVE knowledge of voter preferences
  • p050 turnout for runoff elections is 35% lower than first round. Number 2 might try harder, but number 3 through 9 give up.
  • p053 ch03 From Best to Worst

  • p064 Alaska 2022 special election:
    • Peltola/Palin/Begich first-place(first round?) tally 75,799 / 58,937 / 53,810, sum 188,546

    • second round tally 91,266 / 86,026, sum 177,292 ... Peltola still won, but where did 11,254 second round votes disappear to? The book's author focuses on party, I focus on information that is NOT conveyed by voting.
  • p065 Minor candidates could assert themselves in the political process without being spoilers
  • p066 Author attributes campaign incivility to plurality voting. Perhaps the few jurisdictions with civil voters also prefer instant runoff voting. Causality can point both ways
  • p066 Jean Quan won Oakland mayor because of her 25,000 second and third place votes, after 9 elimination rounds. Or because 67,000 Oaklanders are Asian, and some chose ethnicity third.

  • p067 Voter "mental paralysis overload" minimized with fewer candidates, maybe 4 or 5
  • p067 voters "vote many times" but only one (or zero) votes count
    • KHL actually, their voting patterns convey more information than just their vote, and those patterns can convey much useful (anonymized) information to their fellow citizens, bureaucrats, politicians

    • Downside - detailed pattern information and Big AI can de-anonymize voters and expose them to personal retribution
  • p068 2009 Burlington Vermont rank-choice voting elected a Progressive rather than the plurality-choice Republican. Rank-choice repealed for 2010. WELL, DUH! *THAT* is why we don't DESERVE ranked choice.
  • p069 ... suspicion ... The political-cultural shift that would have to accompany the transition to instant runoff is possibly its greatest obstacle.
    • "I don't need to win, I just need you to lose"
  • p069

  • p070

  • p072

  • p072

  • p073

  • p075

  • p076

  • p076

  • p078

  • p078

  • p079

  • p079

  • p084 Borda count fails independence of irrelevant alternatives

  • p086 Condorcet was a leader of the French Revolution, died in prison as an aristocrat
  • p086 Condorcet 1785 Essay on the Application of Analysis to the Probability of Majority Decisions ... "is also one of the most pretentious and convoluted pieces of academic writing ever composed"

  • p089 Condorcet voting method (used by Washington State LP?)

  • p090 Condorcet cycle

  • p099 ch04 The Impossible Democracy

  • p104 Anonymity . Neutrality . Monotonicity . Majority . Condorcet . Independence of irrelevant alternatives

  • p104 Kenneth Arrow shows we can call off the search party.
  • p105 Kenneth Arrow Social Choice and Individual Values 1951

  • p106 Amartya Sen Nobel Economics 1998

    • "individual liberties are incompatible with social needs" (???)

Around page 108, I stopped reading and skimming. Voting is important, and I mostly agree with the author's conclusions, but I focus on other world-survival priorities which receive very little attention.

  • p112 ch05 To Each Their Own

  • p124 ch06 Strategy and Manipulation

  • p124 Academic hiring... choosing the method to bias outcome
  • p141 ch07 And the Winner Is...

Part2 . Representation

  • p149 ch08 This Old House

  • p173 ch09 Rather Devisive than Indecisive

  • p183 ch10 Divisor and Conquer

  • p189 Webster apportionment or major fractions or Sainte-Laguë method

  • p190
  • p207 ch10 A Country Divided

  • 207 gerrymandering

  • p304 An Infrastructure Plan

    • Use instant runoff voting in single winner elections
    • Eliminate the Electoral College
    • Use popular vote with instant runoff for presidential elections
    • Use multimember districts with single transferrable voting
    • Increase the size of the House of Representatives
    • Use the Webster apportionment method

    • Use independent districting commissions
    • Introduce more political quantitative literacy into school curricula

MakingDemocracyCount (last edited 2026-02-13 07:31:52 by KeithLofstrom)