Diff for "RighteousMind"

The Righteous Mind

Why Good People Are Divided by Poliotics and Religion

Jonathan Haidt, 2012 | Cedar Mill 302 HAIDT

• p005 1987 grad student psychology University of Pennsylvania

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Haidt Jonathan Haidt

The main message from this book is there

Introduction

• xiii Human nature is not just intrinsically moral, it is also intrinsically moralistic, critical, and judgmental.

Part 1, Intuitions Come First, Strategic Reasoning Second

• The mind is divided, like a rider on an elephant, and the rider's job is to serve the elephant.

• (David) Humean model

• p004 family dog killed, eaten. Disgusting yes, morally wrong no (to well-educated)
• p004 man buys supermarket chicken, has sex with it, then eats it. MORE disgusting, morally wrong no (to well-educated)
  • everyone else says WRONG

• p005 nativist (Bible, Darwin) morality built in

• p005 empiricist (John Locke) believes babies blank slates, children learn morality from experience

• p005 rationalist (Piaget) children figure it out for themselves

• p006 morality self-constructed during play, improving with age

• p007 rationalist believes moral knowledge from reasoning

• p007 Lawrence Kohlberg quantified Piaget, defined six stages of social reasoning

• p008 Kohlberg claims morally advanced kids learned other's perspectives from "role taking"
• p009 Kohlberg's framework predefined morality as justice, not authority, hierarchy, and tradition
• p010 kids recognize social conventions different than harm prevention

• p012 different moralities: "Ilongot" (Bugkalot), formerly headhunters, channeled in-group tensions to out-group competition

• p014 Richard Shweder quotes Clifford Geertz, westerners think bounded unique individuals, peculiar idea elsewhere

• intuition and emotions rule, strategic reasoning justifies/explains (sometimes)
• p049 Dale Carnegie: avoid confrontation, be a good listener, instead of reverting to combat mode

• p055 brains evaluate threat/benefit very quickly, Robert Zajonc affective primacy

• p072 ring of gyges

• p075 Accountability systems make human beings the world champions of cooperation beyond kinship.

• p075 Philip Tetlock

• p086 people care about their groups, not ideas

• p088 The rationalist delusion / counterargument

Part 2, There is More to Morality than Harm and Fairness

• p096 Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic . a world of objects, not relationships

• p099 Shweder's Three Ethics, Community, Autonomy, Divinity

• p102 Haidt fieldwork in India, adapted to family rather than individual ethics

• p105 feelings of essences emanating from objects -> reverence, ethics of divinity

• p117 Two axis graph, low-high empathizers, low-high systemizers, Kant and utilitarian Bentham systemizers
• p120 psychology descriptive, how the mind actually works, not hour it ought to work.
• p125 Righteous mind mix of (version 1)
  • Care/Harm, Fairness/Cheating, Loyalty/Betrayal, Authority/Subversion, Sanctity/Degradation

• p146 Armin Meiwes cannibal, Bernd Brandes willing victim

• p148 conservative neophobia, liberal neophilia

• p149 no sense of disgust ... no sense of the sacred

• p150 Silver Ring Thing virginity pledge

• p152 Leon Kass spokesman for Shweder's ethic of divininty

• p155 suggested Kerry speech rewrite: "You gonna pay for that, George?"

  • Kerry could have activated Fairness/cheating

• p156: Republicans understand moral psychology. Democrats don't R's go straight for the gut.

• p156 Bill Clinton knew how to charm elephants.
• p156 after Clinton, R's focus on loyalty, authority, and sanctity

• p1
• p1
• p1
• p1
• p1

Part 3, Morality Binds and Blinds

• p1
• p1
• p1
• p1
• p1
• p1
• p1
• p1
• p1
• p1
• p1
• p1
• p1
• p1
• p2
• p3

Part 3, Morality Binds and Blinds