Caleb Scharf
The Ascent of Information
2021 003.54 SCH Tigard Library
I wanted to like this book. Rather than surprising, it was prolix and sometimes inaccurate.
- p37 planetwide rate of energy production, early 1800s 100 GW, year 2000 "in excess of a fearsome" 17 TW
Source https://ourworldindata.org/energy-production-consumption
- Shows US power consumption decreasing by 1% in 2019; efficiency is improving, and digital controls help with tht
- The earth absorbs and re-emits perhaps 1 kW/m2 solar, the sun-facing disk is about 1e14 m2, so the Earth radiates perhaps P=1e17 W at a top-of-stratosphere temperature of 200K or so. Emission is proportional to T^4, the derivative ΔT/ΔP ≈ T/4P ≈ 200/4E17 = 5E-16, so the heating from the "fearsome 17TW" is 5E-16*1.7E13 = 0.0085 Kelvins.
- The actual "fearsome" question is how the energy is created; CO₂ from carbon combustion adds perhaps 3000x long term global heating compared to the technically-useful energy produced. Nuclear would be vastly safer, especially if the fuel was decommissioned weapon fissionables intentionally adulterated with U238 or Pu240.
- hence ... fooey
- p37 47 GW for computation ... growing by 40% per year
- Source: Nature 561 9/2018 163-166 doi:10.1038/d41586-01-06610-y
- shows graph from Anders implying data center energy (eyeball) 670 TWh/y (76 GW) in 2020, 2980 TWh/y (340 GW) in 2030, 4.44X growth, 16% growth per year.
- the Green Growth graph shows ICT purchased half of corporate renewable energy (2GW) in 2016.
- HOWEVER, the last actual datapoint was 2017, so everything after that is P.O.M.A. ... Pulled Out of My Ass
- This text quote is more accurate: "Last year’s IEA report estimated that although data-centre workloads will shoot up — tripling 2014 levels by 2020 — efficiency gains mean that their electricity demand might sneak up only by 3%"
- 3% in 6 years is 0.5% per year, not 16%.
Here's the cited Anders article: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/6/1/117
Figure one shows (expected) total consumer device power usage dropping from 1050 TWH/year in 2010 to 670 TWH/year in 2030, or 120 GW to 76 GW. Customers want battery life, not hand heaters.
What the graphs are actually measuring is the rapid globalization of internet access, combined with the rapid drop of energy per customer as electronic efficiency increases. Most of the world has some form of internet access in 2020; unless we train ants to use "smart" phones, we are approaching peak power, not exponential runaway.
- p040 "But the smaller the chips get, the more inefficient it gets to push electrons around all that increasingly narrow material" ... BULLSHIT
- scaling: length goes down, wire side area goes down, voltage goes down, capacitance goes down, and energy is CV²
n040 p305 Hasler Marr 2013
p040 Single bit of neural information, 10,000 ATP -> 3200 eV -> 5e-19J = 0.5 aJ, CMOS a few aJ
n043 p305 S. Nakamoto Bitcoin paper
- p047 Bitcoin 7.7 GW
n047 p306 2021 78TWh/y = 8.9GW
n048 p306 Beyond the Bitcoin Bubble contradicts Scharf
p051 Yann LeCun in 2025 VP Chief AI Scientist at Meta
- p055 US consumed 200 billion punch cards in 1967
p071 misdefined Nyquist rate as signalling rate - no, multilevel can add bits inversely proportional to logarithm of noise
- p104 'When Darwin throws "mental endowments" into the mix, our modern alarm bells also go off.' PC-BS
- p108 'Any failure to be accurate, precise, or quick will not turn out well'
- also BS, Darwin made many many mistakes and LEARNED from them. No risk, few gains.
- p111 mirror image perceived same thing, except letters like b and d, we override or undo mirror invariance
- BS; knowing left from right essential to navigation
p113 intrinsic forgetting
- p123 Milkweed emetic for birds, monarch butterfly caterpillars consume it to make birds vomit
p124 evolvability
- p134 altruism propagates shared genes in relatives, easier than having children
p135 kin selection Hamilton's Rule
p138 horizontal gene transfer between species by bacteria
p138 1600 gene regulation molecules in humans
- p139 epigenetic changes persist over generations
p141 Tripitaka
p142 16S rRNA
p143 Julius Rebek synthetic autocatalytic molecules
p143 quines software replicators
p144 De novo gene birth evolve from noncoding DNA stretches
- p144 perhaps remnants of earlier genetic experiments
p148 Holobiont symbiotic ecological unit
p148 dataome
p149 A symbiotic view of life: we have never been individuals
p150 It's the song, not the singer holobiosis
- p152 dataome increases energy use but changes planet. "conflict" or opportunity
p150 ASIP and MC1R genes, prey with lighter colored coats in lighter environments
p154 corg author's neologism for "core algorithm" metaphor for convergent adaptations
p159 predictable versus Poincaré mathematical "chaos"
p164 evolutionary biologist David Krakauer
n164 p319 The Information Theory of Individuality
p169 C₆H₆ 217 isomers
p171 bacteriophage lytic or lysogenic reproduction
p172 viruses switch modes based on signalling arbitrium peptides
p174 poliovirus Sociovirology
p177 information ratchet
p177 Sara Walker Az.S.U.
p178 Jim CrutchfieldSteen Rasmussen Takashi Ikegami Eric Smith
p181 Hokusai The Great Wave off Kanagawa 1831 Kanagawa
- p191 computational bit energy less efficient than biological brain
p192 Landauer Limit 3e-21J at 300K
- p192 blowfly visual system 1 bit is 1e-14J
p195 Activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein ''Arc'' Gene synaptic activity to long term potentiation
- p198 Aleutian Islands 1200 mile arc, 44 active volcanos
n199 p322 "Constructor Theory" Synthese, 2013
p203 predicts (in 2020) 20 billion Internet of Things devices this decade. Statista projects 75 billion in 2025
p209 Joan Clarke Turing codebreaker colleague
- p211 Von Neumann 1957 (age 53 cancer ), Turing 1954 age 41 suicide)
- p212 machine learning, not yet artificial intelligence
- p213 "planet shadow tube of darkness to infinity" ... no, a conical dark umbra with a slightly dimmer penumbra
- fix AI L1 nomenclature to "umbra"
p222 Hox genes body plan
- p225 65 billion chickens slaughtered per year (age 6 to 12 weeks)
p227 c. elegans nematode evolves to bisexual in 70 generations
- p231 Bohr to Pauli: "We are agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct."
- p234 ... the Great Dying 251 MYA (the Permian-Triassic extinction
Michael Benton, When Life Nearly Died: The Greatest Mass Extinction of All Time, 2003
Yadong Sun et al "Lethally Hot Temperatures During the Early Triassic Greenhouse", Science Oct 2012: p366-70, doi:10.1126/science.1224126
p234 96% of marine species, 70% of terrestrial vertebrates griffinfly
- p235 plate tectonics recycles ocean floor in 200 million years
p235 Emeishian Traps The Great Dying?
- p236 40℃ oceans
p238 Heinrich D. Holland The oxygenation of the atmosphere and oceans
p239 pyrite (FeS₂) and uraninite (U₃O₈ pitchblende) disappear from sedimentary rock with rise of oxygen
- p239 first wisps of oxygen 2.45 GYA, +1 GY until composition shifted, 850 MYA geologically rapid rises
- p240 600 MYA increasing oxygen enabled multicellular life
- p240 Snowball Earth, ice reflects sunlight (also has 0.97 thermal emissivity)
p241 eukaryote
p241 humans 1e25 ATP molecules per day ( 507 g/mol -> 507 *1e25 / 6e26 atoms/kg -> 8.5 ATP kg/day )
p242 mitochondrial endosymbiosis 20x improvement in cellular energy efficiency
p243 magnetosomes
p243 anammoxosomes
p248 "I've frequently heard" citation needed "that Life on Earth is nothing more than a four-billion-year-old catalytic chemical computation." Yes, and Scharf is only a featherless biped.
p249 all life contains 5e37 DNA base pairs ... but how much RNA COPIED from those base pairs, or proteins made or regulated by that RNA? one apple ratioed to global citrus production?
- p249 1e24 NOPs Nucleotide Operations Per Second ... probably copying, not vastly more frequent reading nucleotides to control molecules
- p249 computing today (2021) is 1e22 FLOPS (floating point operations or a misnomer for logic gate operations?)
- p250 Computing operations count FLOPS approaching nucleotide operations NOPS (NOT neural or molecular operations)
- apples and oranges, nucleotide operations are molecular production and direction, nucleotide copying is like transistor creation
p263 John Wheeler 1989 It From Bit
p263 Richard Feynman 1959 There is Plenty of Room at the Bottom
n265 p327 Erling Thyrhaug May 2018 Identification and characterization of diverse coherences in the Fenna–Matthews–Olson complex
- much speculative ... blather? ... about distant future
- My take "we haven't seen farther than future beings, because we haven't stood on their shoulders yet" Speculating on what they will see and do based on incomplete 21st century technology is wanking
- p273 Dyson's over-the-top-proposal - two meter shell made from Jupiter, capturing all the Sun's energy.
- "Search for artificial stellar sources of infrared radiation", Science June 1960, p1667-68. doi:10.1126/science.131.3414.1667
- Dyson's argument was for Infrared SETI, not the notion that humanity will actually disassemble Jupiter to build a "spherical shell" massing 200 grams per square centimeter (2 tonnes per square meter) at twice Earth radius (3e11 meters).
- The gravitational forces on that shell would be enormous, and crush strength "Einsteinian".
- The orbital period at R = 2 Re ( ≈ 3e11m ) is 2√2 years ≈ 9e7 seconds, so the gravitational acceleration is
- a = R * (2 π / T)² ≈ 1.5e-3 m/s².
- The mass of the shell is M = 4 π R² × 2000 kg/m². The total distributed "rim" compression force is M/4 times a:
- F = π R² × 2000 kg/m² * 1.5e-3 m/s²
- The compression force is distributed over the circumference ( 2 π R ) times the thickness t (3 meters?) so the pressure is
- P = F / 2 π R t = 1.5 ( R / t ) Pascals or 1.5e11 Pascals.
- Jupiter is mostly hydrogen, a gas at 2 Re radius. If the hydrogen was (somehow) transmuted to perfect diamond, that would result in a compression strength of 470 GPa = 4.7e11 Pascals However, the density of diamond is 3500 kg/m³, so the shell thickness t would be only 0.57 meters, and the required compression strength climbs to 790 GPa.
It is amusing that these numbers are in the same ballpark ... but the bottom line is that a Stapledon-Dyson shell (his term, not "Dyson sphere") is just not strong enough that close to the Sun.
- And even if it was - over those vast distances, the shell has effectively zero bending strength; restoring forces in a gravity field are negative, and it will rapidly buckle.
- At 10 Re, the gravitational force is 25 times smaller than 2 Re, and thickness and the areal mass density is also 25 times smaller, so the compression pressure is 25 times smaller. Diamond would work ... but would still buckle.
A much thinner shell can be supported by actively adjusted light pressure.
p274 Landauer limit ... evasion if species smart enough? BS
p278 Boltzmann Brain
n279 p328 Albert Einstein Physics and Reality 1936
n280 p328 Scott Aaronson 2016 The Ghost in the Quantum Turing Machine in The Once and Future Turing
p283 Seth Lloyd PhyRevLet 88 Computational capacity of the universe
p284 "our species ever-dwindling attention space" ... individuals have attention, and some waste it. Granfalloon
- p286 "Treat information like a natural resource" ... fuzzy thinking
- p286 "assigning a price to the "emission" of information ... more fuzzy thinking
p289 Jaron Lanier 2013 Who Owns The Future Bvtn 303.4833 LAN